Which action leads to a valid claim for an injury protection benefit?

A valid claim for an injury protection benefit typically arises from situations where an athlete has suffered an injury that affects their ability to perform. Undergoing a failed preseason test can indicate that the player was not fit to participate in games or practices, which can lead to a legitimate claim for benefits related to their inability to compete due to injury. This scenario directly ties the player's condition to their participation in their sport, reflecting the necessity of injury protection benefits in cases where the player's health impacts their professional obligations.

In contrast, playing through an injury might not necessarily support a claim as it implies continued participation despite pain, possibly indicating the athlete's consent to risk. Not participating in offseason training does not directly relate to an injury but rather a decision that might not yield a claim under injury protection. Lastly, maintaining a fitness regimen suggests a proactive approach to health, which does not directly correlate with claiming benefits for injury protection since it implies the player is taking care of their physical condition rather than dealing with an existing injury.